| |
| News & Reviews |
Welcome to the Voxilla VoIP Forum.
Voxilla has been a trusted source for accurate, up-to-date information on the IP Communications industry since 2002. A dedicated staff of reporters and engineers produce feature articles and product reviews to keep industry watchers abreast of the people, companies, and trends driving a fast moving market.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Voxilla VoIP Forum |
Asterisk: Soft PBX or switch?Technical support, how-to guides, troubleshooting, and general assistance, from beginner to seasoned pro, this is where to discuss Asterisk, the most powerful open source PBX. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| |||
| I have a question for the Forum members that's been bothering for me a while now. Is Asterisk a software driven PBX or a softswitch? I've been researching this for a while now, I've read through the Users Guide on the Digium site, however; I seem to find more references to the former. However, on this website for instance, VoicePulse (pardon the spelling if it's wrong) has also stated they have are using Asterisk as a softswitch. What gives here? I'm interested in learning more about Asterisk, perhaps going as far as deploying it in a similiar fashion as VoiceP. Anyone got comments? Thanks |
| |||
| Asterisk is far from being a softswitch, it is a software based PBX. It does have some of the features of a softswitch from a functional point-of-view however it lacks the backend to be scalable, certainly not enterprise. Asterisk is a very cool toy, and is proabably good for running an individual company, or even a multiple site business. For a small provider, say an ISP, Asterisk might be good for providing service to their customer base. It will not however scale to hundreds of thousands of users, and probably would not hold up to certification as a back-office solution when this space becomes regulated. Jeffery Williams President Broadvox Direct Quote:
|
| |||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| Quote:
|
| | |
| |||
| Ouch!.. can never be certified? Doubt That! The trick to * hitting mainstream is to get the developers working as a team, right now the * camp (From what I see in the lists) is in 2 parts... There are those who don't understand how to set one up... And those who flame them for asking questions... I do have a production * box running serving 13 sales reps across the US, works GREAT! TOOK ME 2 MONTHS TO GET THE ABILITY TO DIAL IN AND OUT!, One hell of a learning curve. (BTW I am a MCSE and a CISSP) * will be big if someone snaps it up, then dies the open source side of it =( It would start flying if someone would just help the "n00bies" |
| |||
| Quote:
Also wondering if Broadvox Direct (a post in this thread by Jeffery Williams, President, Broadvox Direct ) uses Asterisk? |
| |||
| Quote:
Any sample configs for VoicePulse or FWD or IAXTel? Thanks |
| |||
| Quote:
|
| | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help placing call from Asterisk to PBX through SPA3000 | doctorJ12 | Linksys (Sipura) VoIP Support Forum | 0 | March 29th, 2006 07:55 PM |
| can't receive incoming calls using Asterisk PBX | tkulyk | BroadVoice Support Forum | 3 | October 21st, 2005 03:22 AM |
| Asterisk & Definity G3 PBX integration | pat_delaney | Asterisk Support Forum | 4 | April 30th, 2005 08:01 AM |
| Re: PSTN to VOIP Asterisk switch | maximon | Asterisk Support Forum | 2 | March 18th, 2005 05:13 AM |
| Building Your Own PBX with Asterisk | muppetmaster | Asterisk Support Forum | 0 | March 7th, 2005 08:03 AM |